Search for: "Smith v. Federal Bureau of Prisons"
Results 1 - 20
of 71
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Dec 2015, 10:00 am
Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, 2015 U.S. [read post]
2 May 2010, 10:00 am
Federal Bureau of Prisons, 2010 U.S. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 9:37 am
LEXIS 40499 (ND WV, June 1, 2007), a federal prisoner complained about his removal from the Bureau of Prisons kosher meal plan. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 3:02 am
LEXIS 82652 (WD NC, June 12, 2013), a North Carolina federal district court granted an inmate's motion that both the court and the Bureau of Prisons recognize his newly adopted Islamic name, but only along with the name under which he was committed.In Allen v. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 11:59 am
United States Bureau of Prisons, 2013 U.S. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 10:17 pm
The suit by two prisoners challenged denial of a Halal diet, denial of a Muslim sponsor, claims regarding prayer at work, interference with the ability to observe Ramadan, and a prohibition on wearing dreadlocks.In Smith v. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 7:40 am
Smith, 2009 U.S. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 6:00 am
Bureau of Prisons, 2016 U.S. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:40 am
Smith. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 12:56 pm
Federal Bureau of Prisons, 2011 U.S. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 1:51 pm
Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries 22-204Issues: (1) Whether, under Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
22 May 2008, 11:08 pm
SMITH AND BRUCE M. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 8:27 am
Smith to 15 years in prison. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 8:27 am
Smith to 15 years in prison. [read post]
24 May 2011, 7:34 am
Plata, it affirmed a decision by a three-judge district court panel ordering California officials to release state prisoners ; and in General Dynamics Corp. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 4:03 am
Sineneng-Smith, a First Amendment challenge to a federal law making it a crime to encourage or induce illegal immigration for financial gain. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 10:53 am
Smith. [read post]
27 May 2022, 1:54 pm
Smith v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 12:15 pm
§§ 3584(a), 3585(b), and 3621(b), the Bureau of Prisons must administer the sentence of a federal prisoner in a manner that effectuates the subsequent judgment of the state judiciary that the state sentence run concurrently with the previously imposed federal term of imprisonment? [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 3:24 pm
§ 3582(c)(2) is an additional obstacle because it prescribes only two methods to reduce a sentence: a motion by the Bureau of Prisons or a motion by the defendant. [read post]
